Fleek
Veteran Member
Posts: 3,548
|
Post by Fleek on Jun 8, 2018 12:08:15 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2018 16:15:55 GMT
Vouch
|
|
Fleek
Veteran Member
Posts: 3,548
|
Post by Fleek on Jun 9, 2018 2:52:37 GMT
UPDATE: I had updated the plugin with small fixes (nothing major), and also I change the formatting a bit. - [SSH: user] information to [user@SSH] information - Sessions will now be removed after exiting If there's something you want me to add/fix/remove, just comment in this thread or create an issue at github.com/Focusvity/BukkitSSH/issues
|
|
Markful
Veteran Member
It’s good. And I’ll keep doing it better.
Posts: 413
| Likes: 158
|
Post by Markful on Jun 9, 2018 2:53:57 GMT
Vouch.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2018 3:07:09 GMT
vouch
|
|
super
Veteran Member
Among Us
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by super on Jun 9, 2018 11:46:44 GMT
Vouch, obviously. I can tell Fleek put a lot of effort into making this and I can't wait to try it out for myself.
|
|
StevenNL2000
Forum Admin 
Posts: 6,415
| Likes: 6,936
IGN: StevenNL2000
Timezone: UTC+01:00
Member is Staff. Need immediate assistance? Send a PM
|
Post by StevenNL2000 on Jun 9, 2018 13:13:43 GMT
It doesn't look like this thread was an explicit suggestion to add it here, but since we're getting vouches, I don't have a choice but to object. I wouldn't mind having it on the server if you add a TFM bridge with an ingame command limited to Telnet+ to link and unlink a public key. Your current implementation does not allow even inFAmas or me to grant a Telnet SSH access, and even worse, it does not allow us to revoke it when we have to remove someone. It's good to see that someone is working on this, though.
|
|
Fleek
Veteran Member
Posts: 3,548
|
Post by Fleek on Jun 9, 2018 13:19:35 GMT
It doesn't look like this thread was an explicit suggestion to add it here, but since we're getting vouches, I don't have a choice but to object. I wouldn't mind having it on the server if you add a 1. TFM bridge with an ingame command limited to Telnet+ to link and unlink a public key. Your current implementation does not allow even inFAmas or me to grant a Telnet SSH access, and even worse, 2. it does not allow us to revoke it when we have to remove someone. It's good to see that someone is working on this, though. 1. TFM bridging to BukkitSSH is required in order to block some commands (just like BukkitTelnet): github.com/Focusvity/BukkitSSH/blob/master/src/main/java/me/focusvity/ssh/SSHCommandEvent.java and I am planning to let telnet+ be able to upload their own public key through TFM's HTTPD. 2. Good catch, I'll add it soon. |
|
volleo6144
Full Member
Farewell, ProBoards! I'm still volleo6144 on forum.TF.me.
Posts: 80
IGN: volleo6144
Old IGN: there's a lot of them, the last two being 6144 and Volleo6144
Discord: volleo#6144
|
Post by volleo6144 on Jul 5, 2018 23:16:25 GMT
Okay, I'll vouch (telnet is as insecure as sending your password to a website over unsecured HTTP; it doesn't even try to encrypt) once the above problems are fixed...
PS: Comic Sans has pulled a 360 for me... it's cool again
|
|
Premintex
Club 4000 Member
Coward
Posts: 5,408
| Likes: 2,485
|
Post by Premintex on Jul 5, 2018 23:56:44 GMT
Okay, I'll vouch (telnet is as insecure as sending your password to a website over unsecured HTTP; it doesn't even try to encrypt) once the above problems are fixed...
PS: Comic Sans has pulled a 360 for me... it's cool again did you watch that vsauce vid |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2018 0:04:07 GMT
Why are we vouching? This isn't a suggestion.
As for the technology, I believe it would be extremely beneficial to this server in terms of security [as I have previously suggested]; I'd be all for implementing this, on the basis of functionality.
|
|
_Windows
Club 4000 Member
Posts: 7,881
| Likes: 9,611
|
Post by _Windows on Jul 6, 2018 0:14:13 GMT
I might test it at some point but there is another higher priority improvement to be made first involving a nasty grief exploit.
|
|
untuned
Veteran Member
I untune the tunes.
Posts: 588
| Likes: 283
|
Post by untuned on Jul 12, 2018 18:48:15 GMT
I might test it at some point but there is another higher priority improvement to be made first involving a nasty grief exploit. It's been a week, have you tried this yet? |
|
_Windows
Club 4000 Member
Posts: 7,881
| Likes: 9,611
|
Post by _Windows on Jul 13, 2018 12:22:26 GMT
I might test it at some point but there is another higher priority improvement to be made first involving a nasty grief exploit. It's been a week, have you tried this yet? No, between being busy with work and having a partition issue cause problems I have not had the chance to. I might be able to tonight though. |
|
Fleek
Veteran Member
Posts: 3,548
|
Post by Fleek on Jul 13, 2018 23:32:27 GMT
I might test it at some point but there is another higher priority improvement to be made first involving a nasty grief exploit. It's been a week, have you tried this yet? I did some further testing and I have found some errors in it which I’ll fix when I get home. |
|
- December 10, 2017 (SPaS of 
- June 25, 2018 (Approved by 
- Achieved 2016-06-27, Revoked (for inactivity) 2018-??-??
