Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2018 12:16:49 GMT
So the suggestion is to change how we vote on a suggestion.
So if a suggestion is about, ops getting a certain commands, the op's votes would be more worth than the rest.
(another ex is untuned's suggestion "Exec color change", since the suggestion is about the execs, execs vote would worth more than the rest.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2018 12:29:56 GMT
This isn't a very well-written suggestion.
|
|
Mafrans
Veteran Member
We assholes need to stick together, if you're a fellow asshole please pm me.
Posts: 1,760
| Likes: 1,703
|
Post by Mafrans on May 24, 2018 14:00:54 GMT
The title is pretty confusing, but I think I understand what you mean.
So the value of each vote would depend on what group the suggestion affects the most.
It sounds like a good idea, but I can come up with some problems with it, namely how to calculate each vote fairly and how to decide how much weight a vote gets.
I'll stick with a neutral for now.
|
|
taah
Club 4000 Member
sick af
Posts: 4,778
| Likes: 2,850
|
Post by taah on May 24, 2018 21:27:59 GMT
neutral
|
|
|
|
Post by ???TheHour on May 24, 2018 21:55:20 GMT
Object, although if it's something crazy it can still be denied but, I think it's fine how it is. Lets say that we suggest a command for ops. The command is, however, a pain for admins to moderate because it spams. The ops all vote it in but now the admins are taking up to much time moderating it. I don't think I am explaining this very well so if someone needs more clarification then quote me or something.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2018 7:42:32 GMT
execs vote would worth more than the rest Spoiler alert: they already are. Votes are weighted purely on the bias by the person who is weighing them, and you damn well know executive opinions are more highly considered. |
|
kunochan
Veteran Member
Posts: 407
| Likes: 123
|
Post by kunochan on May 25, 2018 9:17:18 GMT
object
|
|
mattlawn
Veteran Member
back
Posts: 1,488
| Likes: 490
|
Post by mattlawn on May 25, 2018 13:34:45 GMT
object
|
|
jwmphall
Veteran Member
([{<|||||||||||||||||>}])
Posts: 821
| Likes: 869
|
Post by jwmphall on May 25, 2018 23:50:14 GMT
This isn't a very well-written suggestion. This is a very well-written response. |
|
CoolJWB
Veteran Member
Cool guys don't look back at explosions.
Posts: 734
| Likes: 330
|
Post by CoolJWB on May 26, 2018 16:14:40 GMT
Neutral.
I can see both positive and negative things about this suggestion ^.
|
|
|
|
Post by Duqqk (MasonDaCat) on May 27, 2018 0:44:44 GMT
I agree with CoolJWB. There are both positive and negative things that could come from the acceptance of this suggestion. Maybe provide a bit more detail?
|
|
LightUk
Veteran Member
Fear cuts deeper than swords.
Posts: 1,616
| Likes: 552
|
Post by LightUk on May 27, 2018 3:30:27 GMT
Object, we don't need this.
|
|
inFAmas97
Veteran Member
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,367
|
Post by inFAmas97 on May 27, 2018 6:10:50 GMT
I agree in general, but on many suggestions it ends up being a bit more complicated. For instance, using your 2 examples: things like a color change would likely be pretty harmless to other ranks, but things like giving more commands to OPs, depending on the command, would have the potential to affect other players experiences of the server and/or interfere with admins doing their jobs. Meaning it would also need input from admins as it affects them too.
I hope that helps explain it a bit as many suggestions end up affecting everyone, the way suggestions are handled now more or less accounts for it as anyone can state and discuss any potential hazards or benefits (in the name of freedom) a suggestion may come with.
|
|
- Achieved March 1, added March 16 (early)
- Apr 25, 2018 05:24am TPAS by Pramire.
- Nov 01 2018 20:52:02 GMT+0100 (Central European Standard Time)
- Jul 20 2020 15:14:17 GMT+0
10/01/2017: OPaS'd by 
05/06/2018: Approved by 
