LightUk
Veteran Member
Fear cuts deeper than swords.
Posts: 1,616
| Likes: 552
|
Post by LightUk on Mar 18, 2018 23:47:39 GMT
OP's on the server are able to use World Edit to place Water/Lava, but they cannot place Water/Lava using bucket.
What kind of logic is that? I'd suggest removing OP's access to place water via W/E but allowing them to use bucket instead.
This could potentially prevent mass griefing, decrease the amount of lag on the server, and stop people from crashing the server using this method.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2018 23:49:16 GMT
admins can enable water/lava placement when needed though?
object.
|
|
LightUk
Veteran Member
Fear cuts deeper than swords.
Posts: 1,616
| Likes: 552
|
Post by LightUk on Mar 19, 2018 0:14:56 GMT
admins can enable water/lava placement when needed though? object. Well, but i don't think they can stop them placing Water/Lava via W/E can they? |
|
Vicki
Veteran Member
Forums tag: vicki411
Posts: 2,431
| Likes: 781
|
Post by Vicki on Mar 19, 2018 1:37:34 GMT
I vouch, they use that command to grief too.
|
|
Video
Forum Admin 
An op's rights activist
Posts: 5,585
| Likes: 5,893
IGN: VideoGameSmash12, videogamesm12
Old IGN: https://namemc.com/profile/VideoGameSmash12.2, https://namemc.com/profile/videogamesm12.1
Discord: Video#9801
Birthdate (MM/DD): 07/16
Timezone: UTC-07:00
Member is Staff. Need immediate assistance? Send a PM
|
Post by Video on Mar 19, 2018 4:51:48 GMT
We literally just allowed lava placement via WorldEdit a few months ago. It's useful for building swimming pools.
Object.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tyler C. (Seal) on Mar 19, 2018 11:16:35 GMT
Objection
|
|
|
|
Post by Arthestive on Mar 19, 2018 11:54:58 GMT
I object, I suggest we allow both actually. We have some admins that can handle grief, any type of grief
|
|
StevenNL2000
Forum Admin
Posts: 6,415
| Likes: 6,936
IGN: StevenNL2000
Timezone: UTC+01:00
Member is Staff. Need immediate assistance? Send a PM
|
Post by StevenNL2000 on Mar 19, 2018 20:25:06 GMT
I vote for allowing water and lava using both WorldEdit and buckets as long as fluidspread is disabled. We can already toggle buckets from ingame, but they are disabled by default.
|
|
LightUk
Veteran Member
Fear cuts deeper than swords.
Posts: 1,616
| Likes: 552
|
Post by LightUk on Mar 19, 2018 22:53:24 GMT
Alright, i am revoking this suggestion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Hart (Galahad) on Mar 20, 2018 1:40:52 GMT
Here's a question: are water buckets/lava buckets undetectable with CoreProtect? I know W/E can be traced via coreprotect.
Admins, test this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2018 2:43:11 GMT
I vote for allowing water and lava using both WorldEdit and buckets as long as fluidspread is disabled. We can already toggle buckets from ingame, but they are disabled by default. What's the problem with fluidspread, since CoreProtect can log spreading water [and lava] (#water, #lava) - whereas the logstick couldn't. I vouch for unrestricting fluid-block usage (a.k.a. allowing for bucket and selection fluid placement; along with enabled-by-default fluidspread). Here's a question: are water buckets/lava buckets undetectable with CoreProtect? No. Regardless of source, water and lava are logged. |
|
|
|
Post by Evangeline on Mar 20, 2018 4:49:44 GMT
Why not:
Allow:
Water via Bucket and Worldedit
Lava via Bucket
Block:
Lava via worldedit
Lava spread
I like the idea, and understand the concept, but there will never be grief-free.
|
|
StevenNL2000
Forum Admin
Posts: 6,415
| Likes: 6,936
IGN: StevenNL2000
Timezone: UTC+01:00
Member is Staff. Need immediate assistance? Send a PM
|
Post by StevenNL2000 on Mar 20, 2018 9:03:58 GMT
I vote for allowing water and lava using both WorldEdit and buckets as long as fluidspread is disabled. We can already toggle buckets from ingame, but they are disabled by default. What's the problem with fluidspread, since CoreProtect can log spreading water [and lava] (#water, #lava) - whereas the logstick couldn't. I vouch for unrestricting fluid-block usage (a.k.a. allowing for bucket and selection fluid placement; along with enabled-by-default fluidspread). Use WorldEdit to place a single layer of water at y 256, and let the fun begin. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2018 15:33:03 GMT
What's the problem with fluidspread, since CoreProtect can log spreading water [and lava] (#water, #lava) - whereas the logstick couldn't. I vouch for unrestricting fluid-block usage (a.k.a. allowing for bucket and selection fluid placement; along with enabled-by-default fluidspread). Use WorldEdit to place a single layer of water at y 256, and let the fun begin. It's not like banning a troll for this would be any harder than '//set'ing the spawn with dirt.' If an administrator is doing their job (i.e. monitoring the spawn while watching each player's commands), this shouldn't be a problem. |
|
LightUk
Veteran Member
Fear cuts deeper than swords.
Posts: 1,616
| Likes: 552
|
Post by LightUk on Mar 20, 2018 19:36:13 GMT
Use WorldEdit to place a single layer of water at y 256, and let the fun begin. It's not like banning a troll for this would be any harder than '//set'ing the spawn with dirt.' If an administrator is doing their job (i.e. monitoring the spawn while watching each player's commands), this shouldn't be a problem. Wouldn't it crash the server if Fluid Spread got enabled and someone pasted a massive hsphere of water? |
|
10/01/2017: OPaS'd by 
05/06/2018: Approved by 
