|
|
Post by Pramire on Jan 7, 2018 22:36:24 GMT
1. Name of forum member being reported: If the member being reported is an admin, send your request via PM only. Poppy44 2. Which forum posting guideline(s) has the member violated? See totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/8134/forum-posting-guidelines-revised-2013 Other; they have revealed their past identity and have violated the Identity Policy and thus, are not allowed to be on TotalFreedom.3. Requested Sanction (Warning, Temp Ban, or Perm Ban) Permanent Ban |
|
blackedout
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,884
| Likes: 1,405
|
Post by blackedout on Jan 7, 2018 22:43:51 GMT
Vouch
|
|
Calvin
Full Member
I'm a glitch. (Don't ban me, I just said i'm a glitch.)
Posts: 280
| Likes: 126
|
Post by Calvin on Jan 7, 2018 22:48:40 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Pramire on Jan 7, 2018 22:51:02 GMT
This is still valid; they exposed their own identity which is a breach of policy. |
|
Calvin
Full Member
I'm a glitch. (Don't ban me, I just said i'm a glitch.)
Posts: 280
| Likes: 126
|
Post by Calvin on Jan 7, 2018 22:54:45 GMT
This is still valid; they exposed their own identity which is a breach of policy. I understand the validity, I just think this should've been made much, much earlier. |
|
|
|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on Jan 7, 2018 22:55:52 GMT
Fuck yeah
|
|
|
|
Post by Pramire on Jan 7, 2018 22:56:52 GMT
This is still valid; they exposed their own identity which is a breach of policy. I understand the validity, I just think this should've been made much, much earlier. That would have been an invalid reason to make the request. The policy also states if you go "out of your way" to find the identity you're subject to sanctions. This would have been denied if the evidence provided was obtained illegally to policy. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2018 23:23:36 GMT
Vouch
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2018 23:24:35 GMT
Vouch
|
|
Darth
Veteran Member
Server Liaison
Posts: 2,534
| Likes: 1,826
|
Post by Darth on Jan 8, 2018 7:29:24 GMT
In my absolute honest opinion, I object. I don't agree with his past actions, but he hasn't been a problem recently. I haven't seen the term "UYScutix" in a while. Besides, banning him may cause him to return to attacking the server, and I really don't want to deal with that shit again. I say we give him a shot. InFamas should PM him to not cause problems.
Also, it is likely that someone will share this thread and It's contents with him, so think about that when posting.
|
|
|
|
Post by MrDicty/DrJenal on Jan 8, 2018 8:04:19 GMT
Neutral.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pramire on Jan 8, 2018 11:29:38 GMT
In my absolute honest opinion, I object. I don't agree with his past actions, but he hasn't been a problem recently. I haven't seen the term "UYScutix" in a while. Besides, banning him may cause him to return to attacking the server, and I really don't want to deal with that shit again. I say we give him a shot. InFamas should PM him to not cause problems. Also, it is likely that someone will share this thread and It's contents with him, so think about that when posting. This is irrelevant. Just because you haven’t seen them “cause trouble” doesn’t mean that they aren’t subject to the identity policy’s rules. They are protected under the policy until they have revealed their past identity/identities, which they have. Weather or not you’ve seen them breaking the rules is irrelevant as they are UYScutix, who’s access to the server has been permanently restricted. |
|
Darth
Veteran Member
Server Liaison
Posts: 2,534
| Likes: 1,826
|
Post by Darth on Jan 8, 2018 13:16:43 GMT
In my absolute honest opinion, I object. I don't agree with his past actions, but he hasn't been a problem recently. I haven't seen the term "UYScutix" in a while. Besides, banning him may cause him to return to attacking the server, and I really don't want to deal with that shit again. I say we give him a shot. InFamas should PM him to not cause problems. Also, it is likely that someone will share this thread and It's contents with him, so think about that when posting. This is irrelevant. Just because you haven’t seen them “cause trouble” doesn’t mean that they aren’t subject to the identity policy’s rules. They are protected under the policy until they have revealed their past identity/identities, which they have. Weather or not you’ve seen them breaking the rules is irrelevant as they are UYScutix, who’s access to the server has been permanently restricted. I know he violated the policy - I just dropped in my two cents, and my vote isn't changing. |
|
|
|
Post by Tyler C. (Seal) on Jan 8, 2018 17:42:27 GMT
Vouch
|
|
|
|
Post by Drunkle Qrow (BuscusFan) on Jan 8, 2018 18:33:34 GMT
Like I said in the other thread, HE didn't actually expose himself, other people exposed him. So that's a fact that needs to be changed and taken into consideration
|
|
- OPAS by 
- Not Yet
- Not Yet
