?Robin
Club 4000 Member
caleb get off of tf
Posts: 8,027
| Likes: 8,604
|
Post by ?Robin on Oct 18, 2017 0:06:37 GMT
As for robin, lets not forget his buffoonery which resulted in his suspension then reinstatement back to superadmin. IMO, he was not ready to be reinstated to senior so quickly from that. why the fuck is that even related to the topic? and i was never reinstated back to super? the only damn reason i did this because i found it worthy of being a suspension, but if it's not worthy enough to you, then it can be a warning. edit: i'll be a warning from now on, and he can be supered. i can't add him back, he doesn't exist in the admin list for somewhat reason edit 2: my decision doesn't matter so lets keep going |
|
Paldiu
Veteran Member
Executive Emeritus for Creative Design
Posts: 398
|
Post by Paldiu on Oct 18, 2017 0:22:19 GMT
It was due to a question zekurt asked; off topic, plus he didn't know about it.
|
|
Mike
Veteran Member
Hi! :)
Posts: 3,603
| Likes: 2,634
|
Post by Mike on Oct 18, 2017 0:32:46 GMT
As for robin, lets not forget his buffoonery which resulted in his suspension then reinstatement back to superadmin. IMO, he was not ready to be reinstated to senior so quickly from that. why the fuck is that even related to the topic? and i was never reinstated back to super? the only damn reason i did this because i found it worthy of being a suspension, but if it's not worthy enough to you, then it can be a warning. edit: i'll be a warning from now on, and he can be supered. i can't add him back, he doesn't exist in the admin list for somewhat reason You can't add back a Super Admin if they're not online. |
|
mibbzz
Club 4000 Member
Posts: 9,109
| Likes: 12,246
|
Post by mibbzz on Oct 18, 2017 1:25:32 GMT
If someone is screensharing whilst playing minecraft with someone who was an admin but was suspended due to misconduct, can we honestly say with 100% certainty that they were doing so with malicious intent? That's simply not the case though, so why are we bringing up a random "what if" scenario to a real situation where the facts are plainly known. A current admin, was giving information to a suspended admin. That is against the rules and others have been suspended for it in the past. This is the problem with our admin base, especially newer senior admins: They are focusing too much on being right than actually fact checking to make sure they're right. You talk about fact checking information, but have you actually looked at the information? If you would have, then you would realized it's pretty set in stone about what has happened. People like Scutix and Savnith are considered beyond saving as they have proven countless times they cannot be trusted, but for what could have been a harmless or coincidental mistake does not warrant such harsh treatment. Purposefully giving someone information, which others have been suspended for doing in the past, is not a coincidence or a harmless mistake. It's knowingly acting, and choosing to do what you know is wrong. The simple fact is the individual got caught, with straight evidence of what he did. On another point, having a poll isn't really valid when there's suspended senior admins that still have their senior rank on the forums and can vote in the poll; even more so when they've been active in this thread liking posts and/or commenting. |
|
inFAmas97
Veteran Member
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,367
|
Post by inFAmas97 on Oct 24, 2017 3:55:14 GMT
He has been reinstated, the suspension counted and he's at day 1 for applying for telnet and everything.
|
|
