Lykhant
Veteran Member
Rules are rules, set for the better of society. Breaking them taints society with chaos.
Posts: 666
| Likes: 1,224
|
Post by Lykhant on Jul 18, 2020 11:17:22 GMT
While translating the policy, I have noticed two aspects that could be improved, from my point of view. Feel free to suggest more changes.
(Section 2)
This would technically allow players to trick people into breaking Category 1 offenses. I looked over Category 1 offenses, but the closest thing I found was "e. Framing any (ex)member of TotalFreedom.". Framing is not the same as convincing or tricking someone into rulebreaking. I suggest adding it onto Category 1, since tricking into doing a Category 1 offense is more severe than the case mentioned in the original rule.
I suggest adding gore to this rule. The reason as to why we do not allow porn links is to protect the underage members, right? Gore is as much of 18+ content as porn is. Therefore, I suggest including that in the rule. We could change it to "Posting links to NSFW content, scam or money soliciting sites.". In case you ask to also make that change in 3g (Pornographic builds if in a 250 block radius of spawn.), however, I would like to point out that a gore building is harder to both make and interpret compared to a pornographic build. Perhaps it could still be enforced like that, but I will not be surprised if that part does not change.
|
|
Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on Jul 18, 2020 11:19:05 GMT
I object, on the basis of this statement in the other thread: Also, as I stated above, we didn't change the ruling, we simplified it. Effectively, administration is the exact same
|
|
elmon
Veteran Member
Asst. Server Liaison
fionn sucks
Posts: 1,476
| Likes: 1,842
|
Post by elmon on Jul 18, 2020 11:31:19 GMT
I object, on the basis of this statement in the other thread: Also, as I stated above, we didn't change the ruling, we simplified it. Effectively, administration is the exact same I also stated that I agree it could very well be oversimplified and suggestions like this are the right way to go about things. Not inaction to prove some kind of point I vouch
|
|
square
Veteran Member
Asst. Creative Designer
Posts: 1,294
| Likes: 1,291
|
Post by square on Jul 18, 2020 12:18:43 GMT
the original policy had tricking inside of section 2 however I don't see why it shouldn't be in section 1
with "Posting links to porn, scam, or money soliciting sites." just change it to "Posting links to porn, scam, gore, or money soliciting sites." as people will bicker about what's NSFW vouch
|
|
|
Post by zekurt on Jul 18, 2020 12:57:31 GMT
Vouch
|
|
Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on Jul 18, 2020 13:57:03 GMT
I object, on the basis of this statement in the other thread: I also stated that I agree it could very well be oversimplified and suggestions like this are the right way to go about things. Not inaction to prove some kind of point I vouch Your words are that the policy is effectively the same, not mine... That's why I object to changing it, if you're sure it's not been changed from the original one then I don't see why further changes are necasery.
|
|
Darth
Veteran Member
Server Liaison
Posts: 2,534
| Likes: 1,826
|
Post by Darth on Jul 18, 2020 14:07:11 GMT
I also stated that I agree it could very well be oversimplified and suggestions like this are the right way to go about things. Not inaction to prove some kind of point I vouch Your words are that the policy is effectively the same, not mine... That's why I object to changing it, if you're sure it's not been changed from the original one then I don't see why further changes are necasery. So basically, you don't actually agree, you just want to make a point?
|
|
Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on Jul 18, 2020 15:43:35 GMT
Your words are that the policy is effectively the same, not mine... That's why I object to changing it, if you're sure it's not been changed from the original one then I don't see why further changes are necasery. So basically, you don't actually agree, you just want to make a point? If the policy is the same as people claim it is, then I indeed object, the policy shouldn't need to be changed. If the policy is not in fact the same, it should be retracted until such a time the community can properly discuss and scrutinise it. Either way I disagree with this suggestion being implemented as it stands.
|
|
|
Post by DragonSlayer2189 on Jul 18, 2020 22:46:08 GMT
I vouch, as long as beastiality is still not allowed even after that 250 block mark
|
|
miwo
Veteran Member
Posts: 597
| Likes: 585
|
Post by miwo on Jul 18, 2020 22:51:22 GMT
Vouch on the condition that you can explain to me two things:
1) What is NSFW specifically defined as? When does it go from Not-safe-for-work to game-friendly? Softcore porn? Sex-scenes in a tv show?
2) What is a pornographic build? Is my Pillory build with a naked dude considered pornographic?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2020 5:49:42 GMT
Vouch on the condition that you can explain to me two things: 1) What is NSFW specifically defined as? When does it go from Not-safe-for-work to game-friendly? Softcore porn? Sex-scenes in a tv show? 2) What is a pornographic build? Is my Pillory build with a naked dude considered pornographic? fucking google it smart ass, its so obvious. Anyways, added the gore rule, someone else already included breaking any rule.
|
|