Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2020 2:14:27 GMT
The Executives, their assistants, and I have all sat down and re-wrote the conduct policy. It is now human-readable. For a freedom server, our old policy was bigger than the majority of other servers before hand. It is no longer the case now. Please read it. Note that the rules haven't changed much, just wrote them without a paragraph for each rule. In the event that a rule is unclear, I will clear them up. totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/65799/server-rules-conduct-policy-2020 |
|
Darth
Veteran Member
Server Liaison
Posts: 2,534
| Likes: 1,826
|
Post by Darth on Jul 18, 2020 2:15:58 GMT
Yes my servants and I did very good indeed
small word machine go brrr
|
|
lyicx
Full Member
Asst. Server Liaison
fuck raid and fuck babe ;)
Posts: 234
| Likes: 471
|
Post by lyicx on Jul 18, 2020 2:16:42 GMT
finally, that old shit gave me a headache trying to read it
|
|
ron
Full Member
Creative Designer
Posts: 267
| Likes: 875
|
Post by ron on Jul 18, 2020 2:19:13 GMT
very readable and kid friendly. love it!  |
|
|
|
Post by DragonSlayer2189 on Jul 18, 2020 2:25:39 GMT
this is good and all but i feel as if the blurb that was before the origional policy should still be there, saying something about how the coduct policy is not all encompassing and that if an admin feels like you are doing something worth banning they are allowed too and should make a suggestion to add the rule i think i have a screen shot of the text  |
|
elmon
Veteran Member
Asst. Server Liaison
fionn sucks
Posts: 1,476
| Likes: 1,842
|
Post by elmon on Jul 18, 2020 2:31:29 GMT
this is good and all but i feel as if the blurb that was before the origional policy should still be there, saying something about how the coduct policy is not all encompassing and that if an admin feels like you are doing something worth banning they are allowed too and should make a suggestion to add the rule The blurb was unnecessary it was just another wall of text that people didn't want to read and put them off actually reading the rules |
|
|
|
Post by DragonSlayer2189 on Jul 18, 2020 2:36:28 GMT
this is good and all but i feel as if the blurb that was before the origional policy should still be there, saying something about how the coduct policy is not all encompassing and that if an admin feels like you are doing something worth banning they are allowed too and should make a suggestion to add the rule The blurb was unnecessary it was just another wall of text that people didn't want to read and put them off actually reading the rules this is true but i feel as if the line saying "The lists are not all-inclusive; if a potentially unlisted offense is committed, an administrator can take any needed action to protect the safety and security of the server." should at still be in there, maybe it could go at the end or something idk |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2020 2:47:17 GMT
The blurb was unnecessary it was just another wall of text that people didn't want to read and put them off actually reading the rules this is true but i feel as if the line saying "The lists are not all-inclusive; if a potentially unlisted offense is committed, an administrator can take any needed action to protect the safety and security of the server." should at still be in there, maybe it could go at the end or something idk But it's impossible to have an unlisted offense, you can only break rules that are in the rules, there is no in-between. |
|
|
|
Post by DragonSlayer2189 on Jul 18, 2020 2:53:12 GMT
this is true but i feel as if the line saying "The lists are not all-inclusive; if a potentially unlisted offense is committed, an administrator can take any needed action to protect the safety and security of the server." should at still be in there, maybe it could go at the end or something idk But it's impossible to have an unlisted offense, you can only break rules that are in the rules, there is no in-between. idk i think that it was in the original so that loopholes wouldn't be as effective or something, idk, didn't you write it |
|
Darth
Veteran Member
Server Liaison
Posts: 2,534
| Likes: 1,826
|
Post by Darth on Jul 18, 2020 2:56:11 GMT
But it's impossible to have an unlisted offense, you can only break rules that are in the rules, there is no in-between. idk i think that it was in the original so that loopholes wouldn't be as effective or something, idk, didn't you write it No mark did and it was a ridiculous thing to put in there. |
|
|
|
Post by DragonSlayer2189 on Jul 18, 2020 3:06:52 GMT
idk i think that it was in the original so that loopholes wouldn't be as effective or something, idk, didn't you write it No mark did and it was a ridiculous thing to put in there. ah ok, i guess it's fine then |
|
|
|
Post by MrDicty/DrJenal on Jul 18, 2020 3:29:44 GMT
There is also the Spanish version of the old conduct policy as shown here? Wouldn't that no longer apply now as it is just a Spanish version of an outdated policy. |
|
xfilez
Veteran Member
paint me like one of your french girls
Posts: 2,667
| Likes: 3,303
|
Post by xfilez on Jul 18, 2020 3:53:01 GMT
Nothing about coming on the server to advertise? Was that intentional?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2020 4:21:37 GMT
Nothing about coming on the server to advertise? Was that intentional? woops - added (3h) |
|
|
|
Post by DragonSlayer2189 on Jul 18, 2020 4:24:58 GMT
There is also the Spanish version of the old conduct policy as shown here? Wouldn't that no longer apply now as it is just a Spanish version of an outdated policy. it will probably be updated as soon as (i think Lykhant, but i might be wrong) translates it |
|
[/spolier]
- OPAS by 
- Not Yet
- Not Yet
