|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on Jul 1, 2020 2:21:11 GMT
You shouldn't have the permission to control plugins... nobody except for system administrators and developers should be fucking with the plugins that are on the server. We're living on different planets if you think your job as a telnet admin on the live server is supposed to be "performing tasks" related to "server performance and stability", other crap you listed should be senior only anyways. we have had access to it for so long, and i have had to use it for legitimate reasons many times, also that is litterly what our job description is listed as If you have had to use it for legitimate reasons then it either means that we've done something terribly wrong with how we operate the server (most likely scenario), or you should be listed as a system administrator/developer instead of a telnet admin. I wouldn't even give that power to senior admins if it was up to me because it's just simply beyond the scope of a position which is to basically moderate the server...
|
|
97
Veteran Member
RIP Telnet
Posts: 889
| Likes: 679
|
Post by 97 on Jul 1, 2020 2:23:50 GMT
I'm going to simply object. I don't see any benefits from this.
|
|
XenVoltz
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,461
| Likes: 1,488
|
Post by XenVoltz on Jul 1, 2020 5:10:26 GMT
If we merged Super Admin with Super Telnet Admin, we'd have a lot of "Admins" or "Moderators." As of right now there are 31 telnet admins in the "Telnet Admin" group and 20 super admins in the "Super Admin" group on the forums. Merging the groups would create 50+ admins/moderators.
|
|
|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on Jul 1, 2020 5:15:32 GMT
If we merged Super Admin with Super Telnet Admin, we'd have a lot of "Admins" or "Moderators." As of right now there are 31 telnet admins in the "Telnet Admin" group and 20 super admins in the "Super Admin" group on the forums. Merging the groups would create 50+ admins/moderators. I don't see how this is relevant to a point other than we have a horrifying ratio of staff to players?
|
|
XenVoltz
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,461
| Likes: 1,488
|
Post by XenVoltz on Jul 1, 2020 5:28:43 GMT
If we merged Super Admin with Super Telnet Admin, we'd have a lot of "Admins" or "Moderators." As of right now there are 31 telnet admins in the "Telnet Admin" group and 20 super admins in the "Super Admin" group on the forums. Merging the groups would create 50+ admins/moderators. I don't see how this is relevant to a point other than we have a horrifying ratio of staff to players? It was just an observation, I am not totally against the two groups being merged. We'd most likely have to cut down on staff if the groups were to merge.
|
|
fionn
Club 4000 Member
Admin Officer
elmon sucks
Posts: 6,157
| Likes: 4,775
|
Post by fionn on Jul 1, 2020 5:30:05 GMT
I don't see how this is relevant to a point other than we have a horrifying ratio of staff to players? It was just an observation, I am not totally against the two groups being merged. We'd most likely have to cut down on staff if the groups were to merge. yeah well now we have 14 telnets and 14 super admins
|
|
|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on Jul 1, 2020 5:42:47 GMT
I don't see how this is relevant to a point other than we have a horrifying ratio of staff to players? It was just an observation, I am not totally against the two groups being merged. We'd most likely have to cut down on staff if the groups were to merge. I think we should cut down on staff anyways... the ratio of admin to players from what I can observe has been in a state of declining hell for years, and I have never been as disgusted by the admin team (as a whole) as what we have right now and that is saying something given by observations since 2011. Half of the admins we have simply either didn't need the position to begin with and should have stayed as regular players, or are unqualified for the position entirely (in contrast to other admins that aren't as bad, it's ridiculously easy to technically be "qualified" to be an admin here). The other half are more qualified, but extraneous admins contribute to a nasty ratio problem. But that has nothing to do with this suggestion. This is just a step to simplify the admin system, I don't know why people are blowing it out of proportion when this is a very reasonable idea.
|
|
Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on Jul 1, 2020 6:27:54 GMT
Would you care to elaborate on why you feel why it wouldn't be of benefit to simplify things? I feel like telnets are generally more trusted super admins, they have the ability to add people to the rank below them, and are able to quickly deal with a case of a rogue admin for example. I don't think a brand new admin should have that capability. It is also a general trend that Super Admins make more mistakes seeing as they're newer admins and that's perfectly fine as they're still getting used to it. However, giving them access to saconfig and plugincontrol and the other permissions telnets have (that are very useful) wouldn't be the best course of action. Taking away these permissions as well wouldn't be a good course of action as it has been discussed before (https://totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/67193/who-add-people-mb-list) telnet admins' access to saconfig is very useful to the server in the way we currently operate. I think this general 3 rank system we have going on is ideal to not include a too tall of a management hierarchy but still have some sort of hierarchy in place, with new admins (SAs), older more trusted admins (STAs), and the senior admins that are the top of the ladder to look over things. Thanks for elaborating, greatly appreciated. I think my view on this is Telnet never used to exist as a rank, it was only introduced as a way to try and control who can have console access, and that used to be because Telnet used to have a lot more power than it does today. Super admins should be capable of administering effectively and I'm just struggling to see what actual benefit the server gets from restricting telnet access, and there is a serious amount of damage a normal super admin could do already. I'm not suggesting changes to the permissions as part of this, just to try to reduce the amount of ranks we have, because while we have 3 'Core' ranks, we currently actually have a lot more due to how executives and all of that. My view is admins should be "SA's" and those more trusted and experienced should be "Senior admins" because that's the title. I know when I went through the admin promotion process, telnet was not a rank and there was an expectation that admins act responsibly, I feel that's a better model in this case over showing an active lack of trust for admins who's job it is to administer the server...
|
|
Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on Jul 1, 2020 6:29:44 GMT
I don't actually understand where the problem is here, I'd like to know two things before voting 1) Where is the problem with the current admin system 2) As well as this, why should we keep it? I'm not saying there is a problem with the current admin system, my view is that it's got to the point where the ranks are doing little beyond giving an illusion of progression, when in reality the difference is pretty minor. I just don't see the value in keeping them separate, or a real risk of merging them. If the ranks were doing a lot of different things I would have a different view, but actually they don't, one can just adminster from the console.
|
|
fionn
Club 4000 Member
Admin Officer
elmon sucks
Posts: 6,157
| Likes: 4,775
|
Post by fionn on Jul 1, 2020 6:52:25 GMT
Now that I'm awake,
Super Admin and Telnet Admin are fundamentally similar and if this suggestion were to go through it would be beneficial as a whole. This is an avant-garde that will renew enthusiasm and productivity throughout the Admin Team. In my personal opinion Telnet Admin is redundant and I've had this opinion since essentially forever. It's a rank that could easily be grouped in with Super Admin. What additional permissions do Telnet Admins have? Adding Admins? That's literally all they have.
This would be a fresh change that would be better than our current SA, STA, SRA system we have in place. Our current system is out of date, old and the names are really stupid and seems as if they were created on the spot. I'm aware TCA is now gone but that stood for "Telnet Clan-Forge Admin" which was our current host at the time. Telnet Admin stands for the protocol-based console access they have, Super Admin is based on god knows what and Senior Admin makes us sound elderly.
|
|
Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on Jul 1, 2020 7:19:00 GMT
I object. If it aint broke dont fix it. Theres no problem here that this solves. Not saying it's a problem, just feel it's something we could improve on that's all.
|
|
Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on Jul 1, 2020 7:21:21 GMT
I object. Super has always been a stepping stone with perms designed for new players who have to EARN THE TRUST of fellow admins (if they haven't already). If we merge telnet and super, then at least remove saconfig perms from the merged rank Telnet is a 'Relatively' new concept, we managed for quite a few years before Telnet was introduced, and as I say it's primary reason for a separate rank was back when TFM had limited access to manage permissions on Telnet, and it used to basically give you everything a senior had but without Clanforge. I think now that TFM has evolved and TF has as well it seems a sensible time to re-merge those ranks back down. I agree that reviewing the permissions probably makes sense, and is something we should probably think about doing either way regardless of if this suggestion goes through though, would imagine there are permissions that could do with tweaking if we want to make administrators more effective on the server, it's sort of natural when a plugin and server has been running for this long that things historically could benefit from a change.
|
|
Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on Jul 1, 2020 7:30:42 GMT
It's an incremental step. Why should we keep a false hierarchy in place? Why not include everything in this suggestion then? I am not voting yes because its a 'incremental step' in something that i dont even know what the end goal is. How does this eliminate a false hierarchy? Theres still a clear hierarchy here between mods and admins and execs assistant execs and devs and an owner. Unless this server becomes a direct democracy theres always gonna be a hierarchy here. I've tried to keep this suggestion fairly small and self contained. We keep making massive suggestions with many moving parts, and it's hard to then get things done because everyone disagrees on small parts of it. I'm hoping that if we can break these changes into smaller chunks we stand a chance of getting them discussed and a consensus reached in a reasonable time.
|
|
decyj145
Veteran Member
Indefinitely inactive.
Posts: 1,877
| Likes: 774
|
Post by decyj145 on Jul 1, 2020 7:37:16 GMT
I object purely because I don't think that we should be giving newly appointed, inexperienced admins telnet access.
|
|
|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on Jul 1, 2020 7:44:56 GMT
I object purely because I don't think that we should be giving newly appointed, inexperienced admins telnet access. But we should give them the same powers on the Minecraft client?
|
|