Cactus
Full Member
damnit rylie
Posts: 267
| Likes: 129
|
Post by Cactus on Jun 17, 2020 13:16:42 GMT
1. Name of forum member being reported: If the member being reported is an admin, send your request via PM only. blasphemer , also known as ILoveBlasphemy 2. Which forum posting guideline(s) has the member violated? See totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/8134/forum-posting-guidelines-revised-2013 Forum bypassing. alternatedrifter ( dog ) has pointed out to me that his past IGNs were linked to a previously forum banned account ( FurrySlayer42069 ) according to NameMC. namemc.com/profile/TheCornFlakeMan.13. Requested Sanction (Warning, Temp Ban, or Perm Ban) Perm Ban |
|
dog
Full Member
Leaving this world is not as scary as it sounds.
Posts: 218
| Likes: 80
|
Post by dog on Jun 17, 2020 13:18:16 GMT
vouch
edit: i just realised this is my 69th post, nice.
|
|
elmon
Veteran Member
Asst. Server Liaison
fionn sucks
Posts: 1,476
| Likes: 1,842
|
Post by elmon on Jun 17, 2020 13:28:01 GMT
Vouch? interesting timing they just wrote a whole essay asking for recommendations...
|
|
Luke
Veteran Member
Go home to your family, Neo
Posts: 1,124
|
Post by Luke on Jun 17, 2020 14:17:17 GMT
I'm neutral.
Why were they in initially banned? Their rec request states that it was seemingly by Ivan, and I can't seem to find their forum sanction request. Ontop of this, their banned profile doesn't seem to break any rules.
Until this is cleared, I'm neutral. I feel this ban may have been initially false.
For reference, their forum is FurrySlayer42069
For now I object, as there isn't any known reason for their initial ban. Ontop of that, there wasn't a request meaning it wasn't valid. |
|
Darth
Veteran Member
Server Liaison
Posts: 2,534
| Likes: 1,826
|
Post by Darth on Jun 17, 2020 15:09:26 GMT
Neutral. His recommendation request said he had been banned by Ivan without any due process, and if there's no documentation of this, then the ban is invalid.
I object, the original ban does not appear to be valid.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2020 15:14:18 GMT
I'm neutral. Why were they in initially banned? Their rec request states that it was seemingly by Ivan, and I can't seem to find their forum sanction request. Ontop of this, their banned profile doesn't seem to break any rules. Until this is cleared, I'm neutral. I feel this ban may have been initially false. For reference, their forum is FurrySlayer42069 Can confirm I banned this player but do not recall why. Believe it was for a certain reason - I’ll update you if I figure out why. |
|
elmon
Veteran Member
Asst. Server Liaison
fionn sucks
Posts: 1,476
| Likes: 1,842
|
Post by elmon on Jun 17, 2020 15:28:14 GMT
The reasoning behind his original ban doesn't matter because he was bypassing regardless.
|
|
Luke
Veteran Member
Go home to your family, Neo
Posts: 1,124
|
Post by Luke on Jun 17, 2020 15:30:16 GMT
The reasoning behind his original ban doesn't matter because he was bypassing regardless. Yes, it does. If the ban was/is invalid, then why should he remain banned? That's completely unfair on him. |
|
elmon
Veteran Member
Asst. Server Liaison
fionn sucks
Posts: 1,476
| Likes: 1,842
|
Post by elmon on Jun 17, 2020 15:32:08 GMT
The reasoning behind his original ban doesn't matter because he was bypassing regardless. Yes, it does. If the ban was/is invalid, then why should he remain banned? That's completely unfair on him. Because even if the original ban was invalid, they bypassed the ban so now they should banned because of that not because of whatever the original reason was. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2020 15:36:06 GMT
It actually could have been Robin who banned him and not me - if someone can check and see if there was a note left on his ban that would be appreciated.
If the original ban is found invalid, I object. If it was legitimate, I vouch.
|
|
StevenNL2000
Forum Admin 
Posts: 6,415
| Likes: 6,936
IGN: StevenNL2000
Timezone: UTC+01:00
Member is Staff. Need immediate assistance? Send a PM
|
Post by StevenNL2000 on Jun 17, 2020 16:01:03 GMT
It actually could have been Robin who banned him and not me - if someone can check and see if there was a note left on his ban that would be appreciated. If the original ban is found invalid, I object. If it was legitimate, I vouch.  There is no note, though, and you didn't delete any of their posts before this. The only thing I can find is that you banned softie for being Panther 35 minutes later. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2020 16:23:32 GMT
It actually could have been Robin who banned him and not me - if someone can check and see if there was a note left on his ban that would be appreciated. If the original ban is found invalid, I object. If it was legitimate, I vouch. There is no note, though, and you didn't delete any of their posts before this. The only thing I can find is that you banned softie for being Panther 35 minutes later. This player is not Panther, I can confirm that. Let’s treat the ban as invalid since I didn’t provide a reason. I object for another ban and believe the player in question should be unbanned. |
|
|
|
Post by SupItsDillon on Jun 17, 2020 16:43:19 GMT
object under the premise that the user was banned in the first place for no particular reason
|
|
burger
Registered
fionn is overated
Posts: 0
| Likes: 446
|
Post by burger on Jun 17, 2020 18:10:03 GMT
Object
|
|
elmon
Veteran Member
Asst. Server Liaison
fionn sucks
Posts: 1,476
| Likes: 1,842
|
Post by elmon on Jun 17, 2020 18:22:00 GMT
Why are you all objecting? This is a clear violation of of our rules and the fact that you guys are all objecting is beyond me.
The facts are: He was banned, knowing this, he created a new account to bypass that ban, and continued to play under the new identity.
This a clear violation of policy and the circumstances of the ban do not matter, there is a right way and a wrong way of dealing with false bans, this is definitely the wrong way and we should not be allowing people that are not abiding by the conduct policy to get away with it.
I'm going to vouch for a temp ban here because of the possible circumstances of the situation, but they still should have attempted to appeal the ban instead of taking matter into their own hands and bypassing their ban. I don't think a perm ban is necessary.
|
|
