fionn
Club 4000 Member
Admin Officer
elmon sucks
Posts: 6,157
| Likes: 4,775
|
Post by fionn on Jun 12, 2020 14:58:54 GMT
With the recent system in place, recommendations do not give any fundamental advantage to the applicant involved. They don't serve any purpose, they mainly play as a visual / cosmetic advantage. I suggest we remove Recommendations for Telnet & Senior Applications.
What do you guys think?
|
|
StevenNL2000
Forum Admin
Posts: 6,415
| Likes: 6,936
IGN: StevenNL2000
Timezone: UTC+01:00
Member is Staff. Need immediate assistance? Send a PM
|
Post by StevenNL2000 on Jun 12, 2020 16:23:47 GMT
You can also turn it around: why aren't we taking recommendations into account on Telnet and Senior applications?
|
|
|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on Jun 12, 2020 18:54:43 GMT
I feel like depending on how we used recommendations we could eliminate the additional vouch/object process altogether... it's how Mark originally worked it in 2012.
|
|
|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on Jun 12, 2020 18:57:00 GMT
You can also turn it around: why aren't we taking recommendations into account on Telnet and Senior applications? Because there's the vouch/object voting process anyways, which makes them completely redundant. It's a vestige of the system from a decade ago.
|
|
StevenNL2000
Forum Admin
Posts: 6,415
| Likes: 6,936
IGN: StevenNL2000
Timezone: UTC+01:00
Member is Staff. Need immediate assistance? Send a PM
|
Post by StevenNL2000 on Jun 12, 2020 19:44:22 GMT
You can also turn it around: why aren't we taking recommendations into account on Telnet and Senior applications? Because there's the vouch/object voting process anyways, which makes them completely redundant. It's a vestige of the system from a decade ago. Of course they become redundant if you write the voting process in such a way that they are useless. That's not an argument for why they don't have the potential to be useful.
|
|
|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on Jun 12, 2020 19:46:06 GMT
Because there's the vouch/object voting process anyways, which makes them completely redundant. It's a vestige of the system from a decade ago. Of course they become redundant if you write the voting process in such a way that they are useless. That's not an argument for why they don't have the potential to be useful. Then what is your solution? It's one or the other, no reason to have both.
|
|
fionn
Club 4000 Member
Admin Officer
elmon sucks
Posts: 6,157
| Likes: 4,775
|
Post by fionn on Jun 12, 2020 19:47:47 GMT
Because there's the vouch/object voting process anyways, which makes them completely redundant. It's a vestige of the system from a decade ago. Of course they become redundant if you write the voting process in such a way that they are useless. That's not an argument for why they don't have the potential to be useful. They were made useless in the voting process because they were already redundant. If they were useful it would of stayed. There is really no reason to add them back. We shouldn't of really had them in the first place.
|
|
StevenNL2000
Forum Admin
Posts: 6,415
| Likes: 6,936
IGN: StevenNL2000
Timezone: UTC+01:00
Member is Staff. Need immediate assistance? Send a PM
|
Post by StevenNL2000 on Jun 12, 2020 19:54:59 GMT
Of course they become redundant if you write the voting process in such a way that they are useless. That's not an argument for why they don't have the potential to be useful. They were made useless in the voting process because they were already redundant. If they were useful it would of stayed. There is really no reason to add them back. We shouldn't of really had them in the first place. I would've agreed if we had only introduced them a few months ago. I just have a hard time believing they have been useless since 2012 because someone would have created this thread years ago.
|
|
Gommeh
Veteran Member
dammit ryan and rylie
Posts: 2,744
| Likes: 778
|
Post by Gommeh on Jun 12, 2020 20:01:24 GMT
They were made useless in the voting process because they were already redundant. If they were useful it would of stayed. There is really no reason to add them back. We shouldn't of really had them in the first place. I would've agreed if we had only introduced them a few months ago. I just have a hard time believing they have been useless since 2012 because someone would have created this thread years ago. Same here. But Mark created the idea for Telnet and Senior recommendations for a reason, whatever that reason may be. To me, a recommendation is a stronger statement than a vouch on an application. It means that the recommender has duly thought of the applicant in question and genuinely thinks they would be a good candidate for promotion. It’s a motion of confidence and in some cases can be the determining factor in whether or not an application is accepted. So, in my opinion we should keep the recommendation as part of the application process.
|
|
tozzit
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,329
| Likes: 1,709
|
Post by tozzit on Jun 13, 2020 6:18:47 GMT
I would've agreed if we had only introduced them a few months ago. I just have a hard time believing they have been useless since 2012 because someone would have created this thread years ago. Same here. But Mark created the idea for Telnet and Senior recommendations for a reason, whatever that reason may be. To me, a recommendation is a stronger statement than a vouch on an application. It means that the recommender has duly thought of the applicant in question and genuinely thinks they would be a good candidate for promotion. It’s a motion of confidence and in some cases can be the determining factor in whether or not an application is accepted. So, in my opinion we should keep the recommendation as part of the application process. This, i believe recommendations means a person not only thinks someone can be a good admin, but they are willing to put their name down and stick their neck out in a way. Also i see another advantage in relation to the admin training thread in that a person recommending someone should possibly have the responsibility to train them which i think would be a good way of keeping track of an admins training.
|
|
Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on Jun 13, 2020 12:31:27 GMT
I have voiced my frank hatred for this system some time ago...
Anyone should be able to comment on an application, not as a 'Vouch, Neutral or Object' or whatever we're now doing, but to give actually useful information that would aid the EAO in making a final decision as to if they are a suitable candidate. For example having 'The player regularly joins the server and helps players' is much more useful than 'Neutral'
I think a Recommendation should be re-introduced, and that should be just that, it's a personal recommendation to say that you as an admin, think that the candidate would make an excellent admin and that you want to put your name down as someone who completely endorses them.
I think the current system lends it's self to severely limiting the 'Types' of people that will get admin, because if you're not already 'In' you won't get 'In' as it were.
|
|
square
Veteran Member
Asst. Creative Designer
Posts: 1,294
| Likes: 1,291
|
Post by square on Jun 13, 2020 12:38:34 GMT
I have voiced my frank hatred for this system some time ago... Anyone should be able to comment on an application, not as a 'Vouch, Neutral or Object' or whatever we're now doing, but to give actually useful information that would aid the EAO in making a final decision as to if they are a suitable candidate. For example having 'The player regularly joins the server and helps players' is much more useful than 'Neutral' I think a Recommendation should be re-introduced, and that should be just that, it's a personal recommendation to say that you as an admin, think that the candidate would make an excellent admin and that you want to put your name down as someone who completely endorses them. I think the current system lends it's self to severely limiting the 'Types' of people that will get admin, because if you're not already 'In' you won't get 'In' as it were. i think the vouch, neutral and object system is a guideline for their opinion on whether they should have that role or not. most people when vouching would give a reason (and if you objected you have to give a reason) which would be useful for other votes. personally, i doubt serious bias between non-competent people who are friends with admins and competent people who aren't friends with admins exists however you can quote me if i'm wrong. i don't see the issue with recommendations existing, especially in how it's not required.
|
|
Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on Jun 13, 2020 12:46:27 GMT
I have voiced my frank hatred for this system some time ago... Anyone should be able to comment on an application, not as a 'Vouch, Neutral or Object' or whatever we're now doing, but to give actually useful information that would aid the EAO in making a final decision as to if they are a suitable candidate. For example having 'The player regularly joins the server and helps players' is much more useful than 'Neutral' I think a Recommendation should be re-introduced, and that should be just that, it's a personal recommendation to say that you as an admin, think that the candidate would make an excellent admin and that you want to put your name down as someone who completely endorses them. I think the current system lends it's self to severely limiting the 'Types' of people that will get admin, because if you're not already 'In' you won't get 'In' as it were. i think the vouch, neutral and object system is a guideline for their opinion on whether they should have that role or not. most people when vouching would give a reason (and if you objected you have to give a reason) which would be useful for other votes. personally, i doubt serious bias between non-competent people who are friends with admins and competent people who aren't friends with admins exists however you can quote me if i'm wrong. i don't see the issue with recommendations existing, especially in how it's not required. I just think it's a waste of time. IF you go 'Vouch' or 'Neutral' it's utterly useless to anyone who makes the actual decision other than seeing "X said Y and C said A" - Having actual actionable information is far more valuable, you want to know the why that someone thinks they should be an admin, or why think they shouldn't. Having a neutral opinion is just a waste of a post IMO. I think the entire vouch / object thing should be binned. Use recommendations (With a reason why) and then everything else should just be comments on that candidate to suggest what you think of them. I could (And have done to prove a point when I was an admin) go through every single application and write 'Neutral', all it does is boost my post count, it gives no actionable information to the EAO who makes the final decision.
|
|
elmon
Veteran Member
Asst. Server Liaison
fionn sucks
Posts: 1,476
| Likes: 1,842
|
Post by elmon on Jun 13, 2020 13:04:06 GMT
i think the vouch, neutral and object system is a guideline for their opinion on whether they should have that role or not. most people when vouching would give a reason (and if you objected you have to give a reason) which would be useful for other votes. personally, i doubt serious bias between non-competent people who are friends with admins and competent people who aren't friends with admins exists however you can quote me if i'm wrong. i don't see the issue with recommendations existing, especially in how it's not required. I just think it's a waste of time. IF you go 'Vouch' or 'Neutral' it's utterly useless to anyone who makes the actual decision other than seeing "X said Y and C said A" - Having actual actionable information is far more valuable, you want to know the why that someone thinks they should be an admin, or why think they shouldn't. Having a neutral opinion is just a waste of a post IMO. I think the entire vouch / object thing should be binned. Use recommendations (With a reason why) and then everything else should just be comments on that candidate to suggest what you think of them. I could (And have done to prove a point when I was an admin) go through every single application and write 'Neutral', all it does is boost my post count, it gives no actionable information to the EAO who makes the final decision. That is power-posting and should be moderated. At the end of the day, that vote is ignored. Vouch/Object currently is used for the point system we have in place so each one is actually useful and does contribute to the result of the application.
|
|
Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on Jun 13, 2020 14:55:23 GMT
I just think it's a waste of time. IF you go 'Vouch' or 'Neutral' it's utterly useless to anyone who makes the actual decision other than seeing "X said Y and C said A" - Having actual actionable information is far more valuable, you want to know the why that someone thinks they should be an admin, or why think they shouldn't. Having a neutral opinion is just a waste of a post IMO. I think the entire vouch / object thing should be binned. Use recommendations (With a reason why) and then everything else should just be comments on that candidate to suggest what you think of them. I could (And have done to prove a point when I was an admin) go through every single application and write 'Neutral', all it does is boost my post count, it gives no actionable information to the EAO who makes the final decision. That is power-posting and should be moderated. At the end of the day, that vote is ignored. Vouch/Object currently is used for the point system we have in place so each one is actually useful and does contribute to the result of the application. Not really, I have a 'Neutral' opinion of all apps. Technically valid, and still useless. Which is my point.
|
|