97
Veteran Member
RIP Telnet
Posts: 889
| Likes: 679
|
Post by 97 on May 26, 2020 19:53:53 GMT
Sometimes when 1 player has something wrong with their nickname, and you do /nickclean. Everyone else who has &k or &0 in their nick also has to have theirs cleaned when they were following the rules.
I say we should make it so in 1.16, you can do /nickclean Player.
|
|
Feueristic
Full Member
C'est la vie
Posts: 133
| Likes: 207
|
Post by Feueristic on May 26, 2020 20:17:30 GMT
Vouch.
Would be cool to see if it was just the command itself it assumes everyone, and if there's an argument provided then it's assumed to be that player.
Doesn't seem like it would be a hard thing to add as well but a convenience to admins.
I don't mean to hijack the thread, but it seems like in general we have quite a different treatment across the team about nick colors/effects.
Either it was just me being dumb and not noticing things but personally would love to hear a more concise definition on inappropriate nicks.
For example, I've seen admins cleaning nick even if just the nick was black. There were also instances of no action being taken in the exact same scenario.
Underlining also seems to be on personal preferences. Same with obfuscation - some admins are fine with them if specified OPs still have visible characters in their nicks while others strictly prohibited.
Would like to hear feedback.
|
|
|
|
Post by ???DaddyIndica on May 26, 2020 20:35:13 GMT
Vouch. Would be cool to see if it was just the command itself it assumes everyone, and if there's an argument provided then it's assumed to be that player. Doesn't seem like it would be a hard thing to add as well but a convenience to admins. I don't mean to hijack the thread, but it seems like in general we have quite a different treatment across the team about nick colors/effects. Either it was just me being dumb and not noticing things but personally would love to hear a more concise definition on inappropriate nicks. For example, I've seen admins cleaning nick even if just the nick was black. There were also instances of no action being taken in the exact same scenario. Underlining also seems to be on personal preferences. Same with obfuscation - some admins are fine with them if specified OPs still have visible characters in their nicks while others strictly prohibited. Would like to hear feedback. From my experience, if an OP asks to use a certain format for their nickname, most admins will allow it. Our conduct policy however does say that unreadable nicknames are not allowed. This was mostly for trolls who would nick themselves something you couldn’t do /realname on and spam the chat or something so they wouldn’t get banned. Now though, I’ve seen a pretty steep downfall in people using format codes in their nicknames that can get cleared in the cleans. I think we need to fix some things about this, but it’s not the most important issue right now. I vouch for the suggestion though, but I do see it becoming less useful because most of the time when an admin cleans a nickname it’s because the whole nick is &k. We cannot realname this person, thus forcing us to use the bulk clean. |
|
mattlawn
Veteran Member
back
Posts: 1,488
| Likes: 490
|
Post by mattlawn on May 26, 2020 21:29:10 GMT
vouch
|
|
|
|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on May 26, 2020 22:13:35 GMT
I believe there was a command a very long time ago (gadmin was it called?) which had the purpose of giving you a hash for each nicknamed person so that you could see who was who, and given that such functionality exists, I don't see why this command can't just be made to work with that system so that you can remove the nickname for the individual rather than taking away everyone else's nickname.
|
|
elmon
Veteran Member
Asst. Server Liaison
fionn sucks
Posts: 1,476
| Likes: 1,842
|
Post by elmon on May 26, 2020 22:46:18 GMT
I believe there was a command a very long time ago (gadmin was it called?) which had the purpose of giving you a hash for each nicknamed person so that you could see who was who, and given that such functionality exists, I don't see why this command can't just be made to work with that system so that you can remove the nickname for the individual rather than taking away everyone else's nickname. Still exists |
|
|
|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on May 26, 2020 22:48:26 GMT
I believe there was a command a very long time ago (gadmin was it called?) which had the purpose of giving you a hash for each nicknamed person so that you could see who was who, and given that such functionality exists, I don't see why this command can't just be made to work with that system so that you can remove the nickname for the individual rather than taking away everyone else's nickname. Still exists In that case, it would be trivial to just add a nickclean to that command instead of just wiping everyone's nicknames. |
|
Alco RS11
Veteran Member
my old account is back.
Posts: 3,079
| Likes: 1,034
IGN: Alco_Rs11
|
Post by Alco RS11 on May 27, 2020 1:29:54 GMT
I Vouch. I suggest we create /nickclean <player> [-a] where we can clean a specific player or if needed, have a -a flag for cleaning all nicknames, if needed.
|
|
taah
Club 4000 Member
sick af
Posts: 4,778
| Likes: 2,850
|
Post by taah on May 27, 2020 11:29:39 GMT
|
|
dog
Full Member
Leaving this world is not as scary as it sounds.
Posts: 218
| Likes: 80
|
Post by dog on May 27, 2020 11:37:44 GMT
Vouch. Would be cool to see if it was just the command itself it assumes everyone, and if there's an argument provided then it's assumed to be that player. Doesn't seem like it would be a hard thing to add as well but a convenience to admins. I don't mean to hijack the thread, but it seems like in general we have quite a different treatment across the team about nick colors/effects. Either it was just me being dumb and not noticing things but personally would love to hear a more concise definition on inappropriate nicks. For example, I've seen admins cleaning nick even if just the nick was black. There were also instances of no action being taken in the exact same scenario. Underlining also seems to be on personal preferences. Same with obfuscation - some admins are fine with them if specified OPs still have visible characters in their nicks while others strictly prohibited. Would like to hear feedback. From my experience, if an OP asks to use a certain format for their nickname, most admins will allow it. Our conduct policy however does say that unreadable nicknames are not allowed. This was mostly for trolls who would nick themselves something you couldn’t do /realname on and spam the chat or something so they wouldn’t get banned. Now though, I’ve seen a pretty steep downfall in people using format codes in their nicknames that can get cleared in the cleans. I think we need to fix some things about this, but it’s not the most important issue right now. I vouch for the suggestion though, but I do see it becoming less useful because most of the time when an admin cleans a nickname it’s because the whole nick is &k. We cannot realname this person, thus forcing us to use the bulk clean. You can use #server-chat in the discord to identify who has their nick set as a full &k |
|
|
|
Post by ???DaddyIndica on May 27, 2020 15:41:29 GMT
dog - the quote was getting big so I’ll just tag you. I think it takes more effort to go into discord and look than it would to use the clean command. However, I rarely find myself needing to use the clean command these days. Idk if I vouched in my OP but I think it would be a useful command either way.
|
|
97
Veteran Member
RIP Telnet
Posts: 889
| Likes: 679
|
Post by 97 on Jun 4, 2020 18:30:09 GMT
bump, has been dead for more than a week.
|
|
Jayscoob
Veteran Member
Posts: 1,015
| Likes: 480
|
Post by Jayscoob on Jun 4, 2020 20:35:30 GMT
I vouch for the suggestion though, but I do see it becoming less useful because most of the time when an admin cleans a nickname it’s because the whole nick is &k. We cannot realname this person, thus forcing us to use the bulk clean. Vouch but as long as there is an option to do all people as well, for reason above. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2020 23:19:36 GMT
When TFM updates on the server you can optionally specify a player now.
|
|
- March 7, 2016 - Adaptified
- October 31, 2016
- November 30, 2017
- Achieved March 1, added March 16 (early)
