Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on May 20, 2020 9:22:49 GMT
While I do support the idea, I'm also aware that it's grown to be that long generally for good reason. I would be wary of going too far in the other direction, though I agree that it's unlikely anyone actually reads through and understands that policy now. It can be shortened down though. I feel it can be worded better & most of the examples aren't needed as the rules are quite straight-forward as it is. I mean can be easily shortened down to "Griefing" or ""Destroying other players builds" Yeah, I'm not saying we shouldn't do this, I'm a firm believer that the current rules are far too long for anyone to even bother reading... I'm just aware that we don't want to loose some of the detail we've added, because most of it was added with good reason. We need to find a happy medium between what we have, and what your example there is, because I'd say that's far too vague for everyone.
|
|
zeseryu
Veteran Member
Admin Officer
ops rights activist
Posts: 1,181
|
Post by zeseryu on Jun 8, 2020 23:24:47 GMT
This is approved with overwhelming support and already in the works.
|
|