|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on May 16, 2020 23:44:17 GMT
This role was important as there was someone to report certain things such as potential rogue activity or severe crashing to Steve always verifies unknown admin's identities. That's not even a thing for security officer. Last time I checked it was because mark wanted someone else to help him with security, something I don't need, so I don't need it. Another point (ty wilee) is that Steve also manages the permbans, which a new security officer can do. He asked to do it, so I let him do it. We don't need an entire rank to do such a simple task. If Steven were to disappear one day, there would certainly be a vacuum of role as a result. It would make sense to consolidate such roles into one executive position.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2020 23:59:35 GMT
This role was important as there was someone to report certain things such as potential rogue activity or severe crashing to Steve always verifies unknown admin's identities. That's not even a thing for security officer. Last time I checked it was because mark wanted someone else to help him with security, something I don't need, so I don't need it. Another point (ty wilee) is that Steve also manages the permbans, which a new security officer can do. He asked to do it, so I let him do it. We don't need an entire rank to do such a simple task. If Steven were to disappear one day, there would certainly be a vacuum of role as a result. It would make sense to consolidate such roles into one executive position. no there wouldnt & no it wouldnt
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2020 0:37:40 GMT
If Steven were to disappear one day, there would certainly be a vacuum of role as a result. It would make sense to consolidate such roles into one executive position. no there wouldnt & no it wouldnt makes more sense to put one role with all these features together than everything being split up with a security officer we actually had someone to go to if there was a threat, we also had someone who could help us out, give us advice. steven did that a lot in the past, one reason why i made this thread was because he helped me stop daily DDOS attacks and that's why he deserves the role
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2020 0:40:43 GMT
no there wouldnt & no it wouldnt makes more sense to put one role with all these features together than everything being split up with a security officer we actually had someone to go to if there was a threat, we also had someone who could help us out, give us advice. steven did that a lot in the past, one reason why i made this thread was because he helped me stop daily DDOS attacks and that's why he deserves the role we've clearly been fine without a security officer and I have no plans on ever putting it back.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2020 0:41:10 GMT
makes more sense to put one role with all these features together than everything being split up with a security officer we actually had someone to go to if there was a threat, we also had someone who could help us out, give us advice. steven did that a lot in the past, one reason why i made this thread was because he helped me stop daily DDOS attacks and that's why he deserves the role he doesnt benefit me at all. we've clearly been fine without a security officer and I have no plans on ever putting it back. what if the community majority is yes
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2020 0:41:50 GMT
he doesnt benefit me at all. we've clearly been fine without a security officer and I have no plans on ever putting it back. what if the community majority is yes
|
|
|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on May 17, 2020 0:44:10 GMT
what if the community majority is yes I suppose it would fit the trend of suggestions with high majorities being ignored...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2020 0:53:35 GMT
I suppose it would fit the trend of suggestions with high majorities being ignored... Just haven't read them yet, I'll do it now
|
|