super
Veteran Member
Among Us
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by super on Dec 26, 2019 0:19:30 GMT
Unless you've fucked with the core logic, I believe TFM will look to supersede any other plugins if the command exists within it. My personal view on this though is an objection, and that's because we took a lot of effort to remove aliases from the commands a few years back in an effort to simplify the commands everyone was using. I don't think anyone really used the /qop stuff today anyway so why change it? i use /qop a lot and i know the benefits. players and admins will understand why /qop is so good when they use it. |
|
Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on Dec 26, 2019 0:26:34 GMT
Unless you've fucked with the core logic, I believe TFM will look to supersede any other plugins if the command exists within it. My personal view on this though is an objection, and that's because we took a lot of effort to remove aliases from the commands a few years back in an effort to simplify the commands everyone was using. I don't think anyone really used the /qop stuff today anyway so why change it? i use /qop a lot and i know the benefits. players and admins will understand why /qop is so good when they use it. Then why not leave them as two separate commands and just highlight the difference in functionality? Alternatively, merge the functionality together and remove /qop all together? |
|
super
Veteran Member
Among Us
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by super on Dec 26, 2019 5:01:28 GMT
i use /qop a lot and i know the benefits. players and admins will understand why /qop is so good when they use it. Then why not leave them as two separate commands and just highlight the difference in functionality? Alternatively, merge the functionality together and remove /qop all together? 1. because no one ever thinks to use /qop, yet its functionality is so powerful that it's sad it goes unrecognized. 2. that was literally the whole topic of this thread. |
|
Wild1145
Club 4000 Member
Inactive Player & Inactive Senior Admin
Posts: 10,414
| Likes: 9,680
|
Post by Wild1145 on Dec 26, 2019 15:50:25 GMT
Then why not leave them as two separate commands and just highlight the difference in functionality? Alternatively, merge the functionality together and remove /qop all together? 1. because no one ever thinks to use /qop, yet its functionality is so powerful that it's sad it goes unrecognized. 2. that was literally the whole topic of this thread. 1) That's a fair point, I can't say as I ever used /qop because I just would /opall which was generally more practical for what I was doing. 2) Yes, I realise the thread went on a bit of a tangent around just using aliases and all that shit which was what I was against. |
|
super
Veteran Member
Among Us
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by super on Dec 26, 2019 18:59:10 GMT
because opping offline players is irrelevant nowadays and the two commands are very similar, i'll be merging them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on Dec 26, 2019 20:12:18 GMT
because opping offline players is irrelevant nowadays and the two commands are very similar, i'll be merging them. So you're not even going to put in an option to not have autocomplete? |
|
super
Veteran Member
Among Us
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by super on Dec 26, 2019 22:31:28 GMT
because opping offline players is irrelevant nowadays and the two commands are very similar, i'll be merging them. So you're not even going to put in an option to not have autocomplete? when did i ever say i wasn't going to have an option to autocomplete? |
|
|
|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on Dec 26, 2019 22:55:02 GMT
So you're not even going to put in an option to not have autocomplete? when did i ever say i wasn't going to have an option to autocomplete? You stated "opping offline players is irrelevant nowadays", which can easily be implied to mean the functionality may be removed. You didn't clarify what you meant by that or state that you agreed with the criticism on the first page of this thread. |
|
Video
Forum Admin 
An op's rights activist
Posts: 5,585
| Likes: 5,893
IGN: VideoGameSmash12, videogamesm12
Old IGN: https://namemc.com/profile/VideoGameSmash12.2, https://namemc.com/profile/videogamesm12.1
Discord: Video#9801
Birthdate (MM/DD): 07/16
Timezone: UTC-07:00
Member is Staff. Need immediate assistance? Send a PM
|
Post by Video on Dec 26, 2019 23:06:02 GMT
because opping offline players is irrelevant nowadays and the two commands are very similar, i'll be merging them. just because it isn't relevant doesn't mean it shouldn't exist |
|
super
Veteran Member
Among Us
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by super on Dec 26, 2019 23:34:13 GMT
because opping offline players is irrelevant nowadays and the two commands are very similar, i'll be merging them. just because it isn't relevant doesn't mean it shouldn't exist when i say relevant i mean it doesn't have a practical use nowadays. it seems fine to me to remove the feature since barely anyone uses it anymore. |
|
super
Veteran Member
Among Us
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by super on Dec 26, 2019 23:35:49 GMT
when did i ever say i wasn't going to have an option to autocomplete? You stated "opping offline players is irrelevant nowadays", which can easily be implied to mean the functionality may be removed. You didn't clarify what you meant by that or state that you agreed with the criticism on the first page of this thread. by that i meant it doesn't have a practical use nowadays. i'm also using with the criticism stated on the first page as a set of guidelines to make this command the way people want it to be. |
|
