Suggestions that can be closed/resolved

Since you’re not responding to my PMs on the forums I am going to do it this way instead ?Robin

My point in my thread here (https://totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/64545/stop-preemptively-closing-threads)%C2%A0) still stands. Several of my threads have been closed too early and I want them to be reopened for further discussion.

Firstly, the thread totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/64728/moving-player-plots-plotworld, is about moving player plots in the plotworld. Even though the majority of the polled players voted against it, I still think it’s way too soon to close a thread after -4 hours- of being up. A thread can easily shift it’s popularity in the span of 24 hours. And even if it had been up for 10 days: if the conversation was still going strong, then there is no reason to end it. Now that you have closed the thread, you have made it so that no good additions can be made to my proposal, I can’t get feedback as to why people dislike the idea – It’s kinda pointless to ask the community “people are objecting, why” if you’re just going to close my thread preemptively.

Another thread: totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/64703/intergrate-discord-on-totalfreedom was a proposal on integrating the Discord subchannels into the server. E.g. this could be the master builder lounge would be a separate channel on the server, meaning we effectively get a new Admin Chat (just MB-chat instead). This goes off the consensus in my other thread asking for an MB Chat to be implemented (see: totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/64481/add-master-builder-chat-poll) where people were instead vouching for the idea of allowing different channels on the server, if everybody had access to the option. But my new poll was again unpopular (as seen with my moving plots thread). This thread was locked 2 days after being made, but the conversation was still going as I had just responded to one of michaels comments, but that conversation was again cut short, because robin locked the thread by giving the reasoning: “none of us devs are going to implement this anytime soon, i'd find it quite pointless to have several channels like that and it'd be complex to even implement this” – which should not be considered a valid reasoning behind not implementing a suggestion. If my suggestion was to have a 90% approval rating and a developer closed the thread saying “we won’t implement it”, then I don’t think the community would be too happy.

Lastly, I will just copy-paste my response to @creeperseth on Wilee’s thread (https://totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/64692/suggestions-closed-resolved) because nothing has been done. Seth closed my thread totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/64494/delete-inactive-plots-world-suggestion?page=2 with a 100% approval rating, but failed to actually implement any changes and instead just closing the thread with the wording: “If lets say an admin chooses to, they can swap plots to move builds closer to the spawn. As Lemon said someone could just place a block or break one to mark it as not empty.”, which has nothing to do with what was proposed in the thread. If we’re going to treat ourselves as a functioning democracy, then don’t cut corners. My response to Seth in Wilee’s thread is here:

“I disagree with some of your ending points on some of my suggestions, so instead of creating an entire new thread for each I will just post my response here.
totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/64494/delete-inactive-plots-world-suggestion?page=2

Seth:
"If lets say an admin chooses to, they can swap plots to move builds closer to the spawn. As Lemon said someone could just place a block or break one to mark it as not empty."

This has nothing to do with what I was suggesting in the OP. The thread had an approval ratio of 16:0 voting yes (100% approval), so I would think it's quite important that we actually implement something with such a high approval.

To summarize my position: I want every plot in the plotworld that hasn't been touched since being claimed to be automatically unclaimed after a certain time interval (say 30 min). This is to prevent people from hogging plots without even using them. If you want a plot, you claim the plot, and then you -immediately- build on it. If you're not going to use it, then you don't need it.
The entire point in my suggestion was to make this an automatic thing, so we don't have to manually do this. And in the case that someone were to place a single block on the plot and not use it after this point, then we can manually remove the plot. “

totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/64554/discord-channels-integrated-freedom-server

See my response thread here:
totalfreedom.boards.net/thread/64703/integrate-discord-on-total-freedom”



Do I sound like a little bitch? Yes, but I don’t really give a shit.