WaaiFu
Veteran Member
haha floating heart goes brrr
Posts: 412
|
Post by WaaiFu on Mar 25, 2019 15:15:27 GMT
If Seth can’t afford something, why can’t someone else help donate? because a donation is a voluntary thing.
|
|
jwmphall
Veteran Member
([{<|||||||||||||||||>}])
Posts: 821
| Likes: 869
|
Post by jwmphall on Mar 25, 2019 15:22:08 GMT
if there's no reason to keep, and yet none to remove it, why would we remove it? not like it's causing any harm Because I see it is as redundant title that lacks any use. My reasons would be to conserve space (because Seth needs it if he can't host additional server) or because the rank is no longer serving its purpose of supplying maps to Total Freedom. Would it be unfair to say that not only is it not taking up space that could be used for something else? And that Seth himself could do more to endorse it? Also I don't even see how it IS taking up space, I'm no genius on server logistics but I'm fairly sure that the MBW was previously a useless world either way, and that setting a tag doesn't exactly mean much in terms of usage of space.
|
|
StevenNL2000
Forum Admin
Posts: 6,415
| Likes: 6,936
IGN: StevenNL2000
Timezone: UTC+01:00
Member is Staff. Need immediate assistance? Send a PM
|
Post by StevenNL2000 on Mar 25, 2019 15:43:15 GMT
Why do we need to make space for a future project that does not yet exist? You can debate about the exact current usefulness of the rank, but that doesn't really matter because it is certainly higher than the usefulness of not having the rank and not having anything that takes over the resources it uses. So a world exclusively for my builds doesnt matter? That's exactly the opposite of what I was saying. It doesn't matter how useful that world exactly is; as long as its usefulness is larger than 0, which it must be because the poll has at least 1 vote for keeping the rank, it is still more useful than having nothing for the sake of having nothing, i.e. "we might need the resources in the future" without any concrete plans.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 25, 2019 22:08:53 GMT
Because I see it is as redundant title that lacks any use. My reasons would be to conserve space (because Seth needs it if he can't host additional server) or because the rank is no longer serving its purpose of supplying maps to Total Freedom. Would it be unfair to say that not only is it not taking up space that could be used for something else? And that Seth himself could do more to endorse it? Also I don't even see how it IS taking up space, I'm no genius on server logistics but I'm fairly sure that the MBW was previously a useless world either way, and that setting a tag doesn't exactly mean much in terms of usage of space. If Seth doesn't have the income to support an additional server, then why is he paying for unused space on TF? Surely he could allocate some "unused" ressources from TF?
|
|
|
Post by Polaris Seltzeris on Mar 26, 2019 1:53:14 GMT
If you can't pay for a basic Minecraft server then how are you going to continue to afford everything we need? What else do we need? I pay for the current server do I not? I can't afford another one. Because it destroys any possible chance of expansion if we all of a sudden have to worry about money, which has never been a concern in the history of this server.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2019 2:59:00 GMT
What else do we need? I pay for the current server do I not? I can't afford another one. Because it destroys any possible chance of expansion if we all of a sudden have to worry about money, which has never been a concern in the history of this server. Well I'm not financially stable enough to pay for two servers right now.
|
|
Hockey
Club 4000 Member
Posts: 4,537
|
Post by Hockey on Mar 26, 2019 23:19:00 GMT
Because it destroys any possible chance of expansion if we all of a sudden have to worry about money, which has never been a concern in the history of this server. Well I'm not financially stable enough to pay for two servers right now. Why not set up a Patreon? I'm confident that you could find people willing to fork up a few dollars a month. TF needs RAM, but if we incorporated restarts every hour or so, we could decrease RAM usage tremendously.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2019 23:26:05 GMT
Because it destroys any possible chance of expansion if we all of a sudden have to worry about money, which has never been a concern in the history of this server. Well I'm not financially stable enough to pay for two servers right now. That's entirely fine. I would presume the vast majority of the server greatly appreciate your efforts of keeping TF running, but isn't it ironic that you can't pay for an additional server, but you have the space to have an additional world on the server for merely one person?
|
|
|
Post by Fluffasaurus_Rex on Mar 26, 2019 23:26:24 GMT
Well I'm not financially stable enough to pay for two servers right now. Why not set up a Patreon? I'm confident that you could find people willing to fork up a few dollars a month. TF needs RAM, but if we incorporated restarts every hour or so, we could decrease RAM usage tremendously. With the current shitstorm going on (that I really don't want to leave those few threads) I can see a small issue with this being that how would we know the money is getting spent on the server? I can see the claims coming out now that there is even more corruption that the money is just being pocketed and nothing getting spent on the server, this, that, and the other thing. While the server does need more funding to solve some uptime problems, crowdfunding should be an absolute, final, end of the line, do or die option. The server has been privately funded since it's inception and should really remain that way. I know changes come and all that, but this is a very large change, and has actual real life ramifications (no matter how small.) I hate to say it and mean no disrespect to Seth personally, but if the server owner (whoever that may be at the time) cannot pay for the server, then the title should be passed on to another person who can handle the responsibility.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2019 23:29:22 GMT
Well I'm not financially stable enough to pay for two servers right now. That's entirely fine. I would presume the vast majority of the server greatly appreciate your efforts of keeping TF running, but isn't it ironic that you can't pay for an additional server, but you have the space to have an additional world on the server for merely one person? It's not soley meant for one person, but I guess only one person uses it. And the additional world is literally like 30mb. And I don't feel like removing it, dealing with any backlash for it, it's just not worth it to me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2019 23:37:50 GMT
That's entirely fine. I would presume the vast majority of the server greatly appreciate your efforts of keeping TF running, but isn't it ironic that you can't pay for an additional server, but you have the space to have an additional world on the server for merely one person? It's not soley meant for one person, but I guess only one person uses it. And the additional world is literally like 30mb. And I don't feel like removing it, dealing with any backlash for it, it's just not worth it to me. I see your point. I guess my point merely comes from me not wanting useless fluff for aesthetics on the server. It all boils down to me wanting additional changes to the rank that you refused to add (i.e. the last thread).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2019 0:02:07 GMT
I know this is entirely off topic but when I made fuse for my server, it was all in one. What was cool about it was you specified which server you wanted it to run on and it would switch modes. E.g. kitpvp = allow these kits, factions enable economy system. This could easily be implemented into TFM to "switch modes" for a player from freedom to survival and vice versa. Just an idea if you're limited to a world for the survival server
|
|