Post by serrif on Jan 26, 2019 3:08:08 GMT
1. Approx date and time you suspended the admin.
1/25/19 - 9:51 PM EST
2. Why you suspended the admin - include relevant log entries
I am out of carrots. I am out of sticks. Vicki has proven to be an unmanageable admin, with a complete disregard for any established guidelines on how staff should behave. Vicki has been warned officially and unofficially about her attitude, behavior and her general approach to situations time after time and refused to accept the warnings as valid or fair, or inevitably disregards them as a whole.
While scrolling through the banlist, I took notice of a few punishments Vicki issued to OPs:
I confronted her about these ban reasons, where she stated that she was high when administrating. Upon asking her more about what happened, she admitted she lied about being high and was in a "funny mood".
Quoting this from kai here.
She has been warned about this very issue in the past here on the forum. Whether this suspension ends up being valid or invalid, I suggest Vicki be re-assigned to a lower-ranking staff position in the future.
3. Did you attempt to correct the admin before suspending him/her to include a short time removal (e.g. 10 mins)?
No
4. Did you notify the admin that you removed them from and why?
Yes
5. If you answered no to either 3 or 4, please explain. Except in extreme case such as the admin going rogue, I would expect yes answers for both.
See para 2.
1/25/19 - 9:51 PM EST
2. Why you suspended the admin - include relevant log entries
I am out of carrots. I am out of sticks. Vicki has proven to be an unmanageable admin, with a complete disregard for any established guidelines on how staff should behave. Vicki has been warned officially and unofficially about her attitude, behavior and her general approach to situations time after time and refused to accept the warnings as valid or fair, or inevitably disregards them as a whole.
While scrolling through the banlist, I took notice of a few punishments Vicki issued to OPs:
'2103503140':
username: ProGamer_Gr
ips:
- 79.131.170.4
by: Vicki145
reason: I warned you bitch, do not grief Spawn, bye!
'-1972506288':
username: Asta
ips:
- 68.183.27.125
by: Vicki145
reason: Bye techium and never come back, no one appricates you bitch
'1834246860':
username: siggnin
ips:
- 157.230.57.89
by: Vicki145
reason: No, you stop coming bitch
'-487553754':
username: Yami
ips:
- 68.183.137.193
by: Vicki145
reason: bye 10 years old bitch
'1730850551':
username: xxxtentacion222
ips:
- 167.99.150.242
by: Vicki145
reason: Bye bitch, I'll be up all night.
'-2082788892':
username: drowsy
ips:
- 204.48.21.106
by: Vicki145
reason: you never quit do you? WEll too damn bad, you're BANNED!!!
I confronted her about these ban reasons, where she stated that she was high when administrating. Upon asking her more about what happened, she admitted she lied about being high and was in a "funny mood".
Quoting this from kai here.
regardless of ages and proof, vicki has consistently started flame wars over the smallest things (e.x somebody calling her "lemon" when her IGN was LemonVicki, and her becoming ridiculously defensive and offended and in some cases storming from the server like a brat.), argued with her fellow admins over correcting her behavior, and overall immaturity.
though i agree with the suspension for her pedophilic behavior and do believe it is suspend-worthy, others might not think so. so, there are more reasons why a suspension would be valid.
though i agree with the suspension for her pedophilic behavior and do believe it is suspend-worthy, others might not think so. so, there are more reasons why a suspension would be valid.
She has been warned about this very issue in the past here on the forum. Whether this suspension ends up being valid or invalid, I suggest Vicki be re-assigned to a lower-ranking staff position in the future.
3. Did you attempt to correct the admin before suspending him/her to include a short time removal (e.g. 10 mins)?
No
4. Did you notify the admin that you removed them from and why?
Yes
5. If you answered no to either 3 or 4, please explain. Except in extreme case such as the admin going rogue, I would expect yes answers for both.
See para 2.
