jwmphall
Veteran Member
([{<|||||||||||||||||>}])
Posts: 821
| Likes: 869
|
Post by jwmphall on Jun 11, 2018 5:13:18 GMT
As of right now, Senior admins who wish to appoint a new administrator using the SPaS program have no restraints as far as the application goes. For example, a case where a former rogue was SPaS'd immediately without any input from other admins. A 1-day or so SPaS approval time would prevent overly biased SPaS selections being approved in minutes and the issue of not allowing admins to express important information about the applicant before they are selected.
|
|
kunochan
Veteran Member
Posts: 407
| Likes: 123
|
Post by kunochan on Jun 11, 2018 8:15:31 GMT
Vouch
|
|
OfficialLeo_
Veteran Member
Eeeeeek...
Posts: 1,761
| Likes: 990
|
Post by OfficialLeo_ on Jun 11, 2018 8:53:30 GMT
Vouch for SPaSers needing to give the opportunity for fellow admins to release any critical and important information on the named operator.
|
|
Tobi
Veteran Member
Retired, currently undergoing health issues.
Posts: 497
| Likes: 178
|
Post by Tobi on Jun 11, 2018 9:38:57 GMT
As of right now, Senior admins who wish to appoint a new administrator using the SPaS program have no restraints as far as the application goes. For example, a case where a former rogue was SPaS'd immediately without any input from other admins. A 1-day or so SPaS approval time would prevent overly biased SPaS selections being approved in minutes and the issue of not allowing admins to express important information about the applicant before they are selected. Will this apply to current admins who are SPaS'd or TPaS'd? |
|
super
Veteran Member
Among Us
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by super on Jun 11, 2018 10:03:45 GMT
Vouch.
|
|
StevenNL2000
Forum Admin 
Posts: 6,415
| Likes: 6,936
IGN: StevenNL2000
Timezone: UTC+01:00
Member is Staff. Need immediate assistance? Send a PM
|
Post by StevenNL2000 on Jun 11, 2018 11:09:48 GMT
|
|
Darth
Veteran Member
Server Liaison
Posts: 2,534
| Likes: 1,826
|
Post by Darth on Jun 11, 2018 13:40:49 GMT
As of right now, Senior admins who wish to appoint a new administrator using the SPaS program have no restraints as far as the application goes. For example, a case where a former rogue was SPaS'd immediately without any input from other admins. A 1-day or so SPaS approval time would prevent overly biased SPaS selections being approved in minutes and the issue of not allowing admins to express important information about the applicant before they are selected. Will this apply to current admins who are SPaS'd or TPaS'd? Why would it? Panther's doing a fine job, and removing SPaS's will just cause a big fight among everyone. |
|
|
|
Post by Drunkle Qrow (BuscusFan) on Jun 11, 2018 13:41:29 GMT
An ex rogue shouldn't have bee able to be SPASed, unless it was a rogue that was picked by a SPAS and was revoked. Reinstating admins aren't able to be SPASed or TPASed
|
|
jwmphall
Veteran Member
([{<|||||||||||||||||>}])
Posts: 821
| Likes: 869
|
Post by jwmphall on Jun 11, 2018 17:02:49 GMT
As of right now, Senior admins who wish to appoint a new administrator using the SPaS program have no restraints as far as the application goes. For example, a case where a former rogue was SPaS'd immediately without any input from other admins. A 1-day or so SPaS approval time would prevent overly biased SPaS selections being approved in minutes and the issue of not allowing admins to express important information about the applicant before they are selected. Will this apply to current admins who are SPaS'd or TPaS'd? No |
|
jwmphall
Veteran Member
([{<|||||||||||||||||>}])
Posts: 821
| Likes: 869
|
Post by jwmphall on Jun 11, 2018 17:04:17 GMT
An ex rogue shouldn't have bee able to be SPASed, unless it was a rogue that was picked by a SPAS and was revoked. Reinstating admins aren't able to be SPASed or TPASed It was under a new identity. The senior who did it was suspended once the identity was discovered. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2018 18:09:29 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ???DaddyIndica on Jun 12, 2018 2:04:45 GMT
Oh please, how many rogues have been successfully SPaSed? Any number more than 2 (which is being generous) is too much. The system needs to be fixed. I’ve seen admins get SPaSed when their entire application was just objections, and guess what? They ended up being rogues. Not once, also not twice, and might even been more than three. Unacceptable. |
|
|
|
Post by ???DaddyIndica on Jun 12, 2018 2:05:52 GMT
You can’t vote on these things unless you have a good explanation on why you voted that way. Also jwmphall shouldn’t this be in Admin Related Suggestions? |
|
Atir25
Veteran Member
And so you have come, bearing your sin like a badge of honor. What do you seek, Pale Rider?
Posts: 2,280
| Likes: 1,619
|
Post by Atir25 on Jun 12, 2018 5:03:32 GMT
You can’t vote on these things unless you have a good explanation on why you voted that way. Also jwmphall shouldn’t this be in Admin Related Suggestions? Yes they can, maybe their vote won't carry as much weight if they don't provide reasoning, but that doesn't mean they can't vote. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2018 5:03:38 GMT
You can’t vote on these things unless you have a good explanation on why you voted that way. Also jwmphall shouldn’t this be in Admin Related Suggestions? non-admins can vote |
|
- March 7, 2016 - Adaptified
- October 31, 2016
- November 30, 2017
