zeseryu
Veteran Member
Admin Officer
ops rights activist
Posts: 1,181
|
Post by zeseryu on Aug 14, 2020 13:56:43 GMT
if the fact that people aren't understanding the suggestion is true, it's probably not a great suggestion because the "over the top NSFW" is extremely up to interpretation. object It isn't really up to interpretation. You know there is a huge line between acting a bit sus with your homies and full on dirty talk. If you do not know the difference between these two, then that just shows that the rule really needs to be set in place. Literally 99% of the players and admins agreed with the removal of sex roleplay, so this suggestion is just a sub-section of the sex roleplay. would you say "over the top NSFW" is a nuisance to the players?
|
|
square
Veteran Member
Asst. Creative Designer
Posts: 1,294
| Likes: 1,291
|
Post by square on Aug 14, 2020 13:57:08 GMT
if the fact that people aren't understanding the suggestion is true, it's probably not a great suggestion because the "over the top NSFW" is extremely up to interpretation. object It isn't really up to interpretation. You know there is a huge line between acting a bit sus with your homies and full on dirty talk. If you do not know the difference between these two, then that just shows that the rule really needs to be set in place. Literally 99% of the players and admins agreed with the removal of sex roleplay, so this suggestion is just a sub-section of the sex roleplay. your previous example was sexRP, which is against the rules now. putting a rule that says "saying over the top NSFW" is most certainly up to interpretation as there is no clear line between saying "i fucked this person" and something else as it will always shift from admin to admin and to say that there IS a massive line would be straight up false. is NSFW talk a nuisance to the players, anyways? if they are being harassed with it, that's against the rules, and can easily /ignore them.
|
|
Daniels
Veteran Member
Posts: 349
| Likes: 197
|
Post by Daniels on Aug 14, 2020 15:38:58 GMT
It isn't really up to interpretation. You know there is a huge line between acting a bit sus with your homies and full on dirty talk. If you do not know the difference between these two, then that just shows that the rule really needs to be set in place. Literally 99% of the players and admins agreed with the removal of sex roleplay, so this suggestion is just a sub-section of the sex roleplay. your previous example was sexRP, which is against the rules now. putting a rule that says "saying over the top NSFW" is most certainly up to interpretation as there is no clear line between saying "i fucked this person" and something else as it will always shift from admin to admin and to say that there IS a massive line would be straight up false. is NSFW talk a nuisance to the players, anyways? if they are being harassed with it, that's against the rules, and can easily /ignore them. All of you use your main argument of "this server has a main age range of 8-14", and yet when a matter like this pops up all of you decide to simply ignore it and object? I guess you can also easily /ignore people who are doing sex roleplay and if people are being harassed by the "sex roleplay", that is also against the rules.
|
|
square
Veteran Member
Asst. Creative Designer
Posts: 1,294
| Likes: 1,291
|
Post by square on Aug 14, 2020 15:40:06 GMT
your previous example was sexRP, which is against the rules now. putting a rule that says "saying over the top NSFW" is most certainly up to interpretation as there is no clear line between saying "i fucked this person" and something else as it will always shift from admin to admin and to say that there IS a massive line would be straight up false. is NSFW talk a nuisance to the players, anyways? if they are being harassed with it, that's against the rules, and can easily /ignore them. All of you use your main argument of "this server has a main age range of 8-14", and yet when a matter like this pops up all of you decide to simply ignore it and object? I guess you can also easily /ignore people who are doing sex roleplay and if people are being harassed by the "sex roleplay", that is also against the rules. i'm not using that argument, i'm just saying that the suggested implementation of this is too up to personal interpretation of "over the top"
|
|
miwo
Veteran Member
Posts: 597
| Likes: 585
|
Post by miwo on Aug 14, 2020 15:40:16 GMT
your previous example was sexRP, which is against the rules now. putting a rule that says "saying over the top NSFW" is most certainly up to interpretation as there is no clear line between saying "i fucked this person" and something else as it will always shift from admin to admin and to say that there IS a massive line would be straight up false. is NSFW talk a nuisance to the players, anyways? if they are being harassed with it, that's against the rules, and can easily /ignore them. All of you use your main argument of "this server has a main age range of 8-14", and yet when a matter like this pops up all of you decide to simply ignore it and object? I guess you can also easily /ignore people who are doing sex roleplay and if people are being harassed by the "sex roleplay", that is also against the rules. "Total Freedom". The default is to not restrict language.
|
|
Daniels
Veteran Member
Posts: 349
| Likes: 197
|
Post by Daniels on Aug 14, 2020 17:56:43 GMT
All of you use your main argument of "this server has a main age range of 8-14", and yet when a matter like this pops up all of you decide to simply ignore it and object? I guess you can also easily /ignore people who are doing sex roleplay and if people are being harassed by the "sex roleplay", that is also against the rules. "Total Freedom". The default is to not restrict language. But the whole concept of sex roleplay on the server is with language. If sex roleplay is forbidden, then over the top NSFW should be forbidden too.
|
|
prince
Veteran Member
cool
Posts: 435
| Likes: 969
|
Post by prince on Aug 14, 2020 18:25:36 GMT
we're virgins anyways just let us have some fun CERTAINLY not me object
|
|
dog
Full Member
Leaving this world is not as scary as it sounds.
Posts: 218
| Likes: 80
|
Post by dog on Aug 15, 2020 14:40:47 GMT
Object refer above
|
|
fleshy_
Full Member
goodbye proboards
Posts: 282
|
Post by fleshy_ on Aug 15, 2020 15:02:29 GMT
"Total Freedom". The default is to not restrict language. But the whole concept of sex roleplay on the server is with language. If sex roleplay is forbidden, then over the top NSFW should be forbidden too. Over the top NSFW =/= Sex RP Why do people not get this
|
|
elmon
Veteran Member
Asst. Server Liaison
fionn sucks
Posts: 1,476
| Likes: 1,842
|
Post by elmon on Aug 15, 2020 15:24:54 GMT
Object.
|
|
|
Post by Telesphoreo on Aug 15, 2020 17:33:38 GMT
Object
|
|
Luke
Veteran Member
Go home to your family, Neo
Posts: 1,124
|
Post by Luke on Aug 15, 2020 17:47:53 GMT
objection
|
|